When a debtor files for bankruptcy and receives a discharge, the Order Discharging Debtor will absolve the debtor of all dischargeable debts, and bar creditors from collecting those debts from the debtor in the future.
However, certain creditors can file a lien against property (usually real property) to ensure that their loan is paid. If your creditors have recorded liens against your property, the discharge order will not automatically discharge those liens. In certain cases, it is possible to avoid the lien (i.e., strip off the lien), but your bankruptcy attorney must file a motion to do so. Certain liens are not avoidable, such as liens given with your consent and tax liens) and will remain on the property. The most common example of an unavoidable lien is your typical mortgage.
Most people are familiar with the legal relationship between a borrower and a lender in the context of a mortgage – a bank lends money to someone wishing to purchase a home, and in exchange for the loan and the borrower’s promise to repay the debt, the lender places a lien against the property granting them certain rights, including the right to foreclose if the debtor does not honor the terms of the borrower’s obligation to repay. This arrangement protects the lender by giving them legal recourse against the collateral, so that they can recoup all or a portion of their loan if the borrower fails to pay.
A lien arising out of a mortgage is not avoidable because it is “voluntary”. Here, the borrower allowed the lender to place a lien on his or her property (or pledged some other collateral) in exchange for something of value, such as a loan. Voluntary liens are not avoidable in bankruptcy pursuant to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Although the borrower can never pursue the discharged debtor for any deficiency, in order to pass clear title to the property upon sale, the lien must either be paid by the new buyer or discharged (i.e., forgiven) by the lender.
In addition, liens placed against property by government institutions for taxes are not avoidable in bankruptcy.
In certain cases, however, a creditor may have obtained a lien against your property against your will. The most common is a judicial lien, in which a creditor has taken you to Court for an unpaid debt, obtained a judgment in their favor, and requested a sheriff to “execute” that judgment against your property. A copy of the judgment would be recorded in the registry of deeds in your county against your property. As before, even if the underlying debt is discharged in bankruptcy, the lien obtained by the creditor remains in place. The debt does not have to be repaid by virtue of the discharge, but the lien will continue to cloud the title to the property, making a future sale difficult or impossible if the lien is not paid at closing.
11 U.S.C. § 522(f) permits a debtor to remove liens based on a legal judgment of a nonpriority creditor – to the extent the lien encumbers the value of the debtor’s exemption(s) in the property. Put another way, if the value of the debtor’s equity in the property would be exempt even without the encumbering lien, a court, on motion of the debtor, may avoid the lien, effectively stripping it from the title history of the property.
The procedure for avoiding a judicial lien varies from state to state, and must be made by motion to the court. If any of your creditors have obtained a legal judgment against you, and recorded that judgment as a lien against your property, simply filing for bankruptcy isn’t enough. Ensure that your bankruptcy attorney is aware of the existence of the lien, and they will be able to advise you as to whether it can be avoided, and if so, file the appropriate motion with the Court.
Friday, June 8, 2012
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Learning to Fly and Bankruptcy Exemptions

I would like to lean to fly. Not in a superman sense – in a “small aircraft” sense. As the first step in achieving that goal, this past weekend, I took a flying lesson and had a great time. When I was done, I was mulling over the legal ramifications of aircraft ownership, and as my legal mind started to wander, I pondered how the ownership of an aircraft would be handled in a bankruptcy. While this may not be where your mind would have wandered, consider it an occupational hazard of being a bankruptcy attorney. I don’t want you to get the wrong impression, but when you are a bankruptcy attorney, you sometimes can’t help but look at the world through a proverbial “bankruptcy filter”.
Since not everyone wants, or owns, an airplane, writing an answer to “how would a small aircraft be treated in bankruptcy” might seem somewhat superfluous. In fact, the rest of the people in my office would no sooner get into a small plane as they would shave their head. But what occurred to me is that nearly everyone has their “learning to fly.”
In good financial times, most of us purchase “toys” or other items that support our hobbies, but what happens when the same folks may be facing bankruptcy? If selling the toys and paying the debt is not an option, how are these items treated in bankruptcy? The “toys” could be anything: aircraft, boats, motorcycles, or classic cars. Maybe motors aren’t your thing, but you have a nice collection of high-end computers and electronics. If you spend your Sundays working in a wood shop, woodworking equipment or other tools might be your “toys”.
How are these hobby items treated in bankruptcy?
Like any other asset, the item you seek to protect must be disclosed to the bankruptcy court (along with all other assets) and are subject to acquisition by the trustee if they are not exempt under the Federal or Massachusetts exemptions. There are a number of exemptions that may be used to establish the exemptability of items. Ultimately, the amount of the allowable exemptions may be affected by the debtor’s desire to exempt other personal property, but generally speaking, the following exemptions are available to protect a debtor’s items which do not fall into a specific exemption category (such as jewelry, certain religious articles or motor vehicles, which are discussed later on):
Federal Exemptions:
11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(5): $1,150.00, which is federal catch-all exemption and may be applied to any personal property owned by the debtor;
11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(5): Up to $10,825.00 of unused home equity not already exempted under 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(1);
11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(6): $2,175.00 for tools and equipment used in business. For this exemption to be applicable to the debtor, the debtor must establish that the items are necessary for the debtor’s trade, employment or business.
Massachusetts Exemptions
A debtor filing for bankruptcy in Massachusetts may elect either the Federal exemptions or the Massachusetts exemptions. Massachusetts exemptions applicable to firearms ownership are as follows:
M.G.L. c. 235 § 34(5): $5,000.00 for tools and equipment used in business. Like the federal exemptions, for this exemption to be applicable to the debtor, the debtor must establish that the items are necessary for the debtor’s trade, employment or business. Therefore, if the items are used in the debtor’s business or money-making efforts, they may be exempt up to $5,000.00, regardless of their less intrinsic value as hobby items to the debtor.
M.G.L. c. 235 § 34(17): Up to $6,000.00, representing the debtor’s aggregate interest in any personal property, not to exceed $1,000 in value, plus up to $5,000 of any unused dollar amount of the aggregate exemptions provided for the exemption of household furnishings, tools of the trade and a motor vehicle.
Special Considerations for Motor Vehicles
In Massachusetts, you can exempt up to $7,500 in equity in one car or other vehicle that you use for personal transportation or to find or maintain employment. If you are 60 years of age or older, or if you are disabled, you can exempt up to $15,000. If you decide to use the federal bankruptcy exemptions, you can exempt up to $3,450 of equity in your motor vehicle. The law does not care if your one primary vehicle is a 2005 Honda Civic, a 2012 Harley-Davidson Dyna Super Glide or a 1969 Yenko Camaro; only the amount of the debtor’s equity in the vehicle matters.
If the item you seek to protect is a registered motor vehicle, but not your primary mode of transportation, some trustees will disallow an exemption claimed under either the federal or Massachusetts “motor vehicle” exemptions. Additionally, although the Massachusetts exemption laws specifically state “automobile”, many trustees will not object to the debtor’s attempt to discharge a motorcycle if it is your primary mode of transpiration.
So, what does this all mean?
It means that the answer to the original question is “it depends”. The ability to exempt hobby items largely turns on the value of the item, and the other expemptions already claimed by the debtor for such necessities as their home, household goods and furnishings, or employment-related tools. In a “perfect storm” of circumstances, you may be able to exempt upwards of $20,000 of equity in your “toys”, but the real value depends on the totality of circumstances in your bankruptcy case.
If you are facing bankruptcy and have personal and other property, such as a home and retirement accounts that you want to ensure is protected through the bankruptcy process, contact Attorney Matthew P. Trask to learn more about how to protect your assets and find your financial freedom.
Thursday, May 31, 2012
I am the primary borrower on a loan and my cosigner has filed for bankruptcy. What should I do to protect myself?
A co-signer is an individual who is promising to repay a loan in the event the primary borrower defaults. In many cases, having a co-signer on a loan may have been necessary to obtain the loan because the primary borrower’s credit rating was insufficient to qualify on their own, and the co-signer stepped in to assist the primary borrower to obtain financing.
As we discussed in our previous post, if the primary borrower defaults (or files bankruptcy), the co-signer will be required to pay the loan back. But what about the reverse situation?
How is the primary borrower affected if the cosigner files for bankruptcy?
Consider the same example: Adam wants to buy a car, but can only qualify for a loan with a co-signer. Betsy agrees to co-sign, but her name is not listed on the title as an owner of the vehicle. This time Betsy files for bankruptcy and obtains a discharge of the car loan. For the sake of simplicity, we will assume that Betsy has no ownership in the vehicle that may be attributed to her by the Trustee.
Adam is still legally obligated to repay the unpaid balance of the loan. However, when Adam pays off the loan, all liens will be released, and the title will be issued in Adam’s name. Most auto financing agreements make no distinction between the “borrower” and “co-borrower” aside from whose name the title will ultimately be issued to. As such, the bankruptcy of a co-borrower is similarly a breach of the terms of the loan, and could result in a default under the terms of the note. As before, the bankruptcy (and discharge) of the co-borrower’s obligation leaves the lender in a position where they can only pursue one individual, not two, in the event the loan is not paid.
This material departure from the original agreed upon terms could be considered a default, and in fact, many auto financing agreements specifically include such a term. However, it has been my experience that the lender will receive a greater financial return by accepting the primary borrower’s monthly payments than they would by repossessing the vehicle and selling it at auction, meaning that the primary borrower will likely keep the vehicle, despite the co-borrower’s bankruptcy.
In the event a co-borrower files for bankruptcy, the best thing that the primary borrower can do is seek to refinance the balance on the car loan, if possible. Many credit unions and some larger banks offer automobile refinancing loans. By refinancing the loan, the primary borrower has effectively paid off the loan securing the vehicle, and negated any circumstances which could trigger a default. If handled properly, and for a qualified borrower, it is often possible to keep payments the same, or even lower payments upon refinancing the car.
A borrower may be tempted to sign a reaffirmation agreement presented by the lender. However, executing the reaffirmation agreement is, in my opinion, not a legal guarantee that the bank will take no further action, nor will it cure any default under the terms of the note upon the co-borrower’s filing for bankruptcy. First, in order to cure the issue of default, at a minimum, the co-borrower filing for bankruptcy would have to sign. A reaffirmation agreement is an agreement arising in the context of a bankruptcy case. Here, the primary borrower is not seeking bankruptcy protection, nor is he electing to “remove” the debt from the discharge order; and therefore the primary borrower, Adam in our example above, has no standing to sign the reaffirmation agreement.
The bankruptcy of a co-borrower should not appear on Adam’s credit report, but because some lenders will automate their reports to credit agencies, there is a reasonable likelihood that the entry may make some indication of bankruptcy. If this happens, the information in the credit report is incorrect. It may be necessary to contact the three credit bureaus (Equifax, Experian, and Trans Union) as well as the lending institution to ensure that this information is correctly reported on the primary borrower’s credit report. Again, refinancing with a new loan is the simplest way to resolve this issue because then the loan will be listed as paid, and the new loan will report positively on a credit report (as long as you continue to pay it on time).
As with the decision to co-sign a loan, the decision to obtain a loan requiring a co-signer comes with significant legal consequences if the co-signer does not honor the terms of the note. Consider the need to take out a loan with a co-signer carefully, and if the co-signer files for bankruptcy , it may be worth your while to reach out to a bankruptcy attorney to better understand your options and obligations regarding the loan.
As we discussed in our previous post, if the primary borrower defaults (or files bankruptcy), the co-signer will be required to pay the loan back. But what about the reverse situation?
How is the primary borrower affected if the cosigner files for bankruptcy?
Consider the same example: Adam wants to buy a car, but can only qualify for a loan with a co-signer. Betsy agrees to co-sign, but her name is not listed on the title as an owner of the vehicle. This time Betsy files for bankruptcy and obtains a discharge of the car loan. For the sake of simplicity, we will assume that Betsy has no ownership in the vehicle that may be attributed to her by the Trustee.
Adam is still legally obligated to repay the unpaid balance of the loan. However, when Adam pays off the loan, all liens will be released, and the title will be issued in Adam’s name. Most auto financing agreements make no distinction between the “borrower” and “co-borrower” aside from whose name the title will ultimately be issued to. As such, the bankruptcy of a co-borrower is similarly a breach of the terms of the loan, and could result in a default under the terms of the note. As before, the bankruptcy (and discharge) of the co-borrower’s obligation leaves the lender in a position where they can only pursue one individual, not two, in the event the loan is not paid.
This material departure from the original agreed upon terms could be considered a default, and in fact, many auto financing agreements specifically include such a term. However, it has been my experience that the lender will receive a greater financial return by accepting the primary borrower’s monthly payments than they would by repossessing the vehicle and selling it at auction, meaning that the primary borrower will likely keep the vehicle, despite the co-borrower’s bankruptcy.
In the event a co-borrower files for bankruptcy, the best thing that the primary borrower can do is seek to refinance the balance on the car loan, if possible. Many credit unions and some larger banks offer automobile refinancing loans. By refinancing the loan, the primary borrower has effectively paid off the loan securing the vehicle, and negated any circumstances which could trigger a default. If handled properly, and for a qualified borrower, it is often possible to keep payments the same, or even lower payments upon refinancing the car.
A borrower may be tempted to sign a reaffirmation agreement presented by the lender. However, executing the reaffirmation agreement is, in my opinion, not a legal guarantee that the bank will take no further action, nor will it cure any default under the terms of the note upon the co-borrower’s filing for bankruptcy. First, in order to cure the issue of default, at a minimum, the co-borrower filing for bankruptcy would have to sign. A reaffirmation agreement is an agreement arising in the context of a bankruptcy case. Here, the primary borrower is not seeking bankruptcy protection, nor is he electing to “remove” the debt from the discharge order; and therefore the primary borrower, Adam in our example above, has no standing to sign the reaffirmation agreement.
The bankruptcy of a co-borrower should not appear on Adam’s credit report, but because some lenders will automate their reports to credit agencies, there is a reasonable likelihood that the entry may make some indication of bankruptcy. If this happens, the information in the credit report is incorrect. It may be necessary to contact the three credit bureaus (Equifax, Experian, and Trans Union) as well as the lending institution to ensure that this information is correctly reported on the primary borrower’s credit report. Again, refinancing with a new loan is the simplest way to resolve this issue because then the loan will be listed as paid, and the new loan will report positively on a credit report (as long as you continue to pay it on time).
As with the decision to co-sign a loan, the decision to obtain a loan requiring a co-signer comes with significant legal consequences if the co-signer does not honor the terms of the note. Consider the need to take out a loan with a co-signer carefully, and if the co-signer files for bankruptcy , it may be worth your while to reach out to a bankruptcy attorney to better understand your options and obligations regarding the loan.
I co-signed a loan and the primary borrower has filed for bankruptcy. What should I do to protect myself?
A co-signer is an individual who is promising to repay a loan in the event the primary borrower defaults. In many cases, having a co-signer on a loan may have been necessary to obtain the loan because the primary borrower’s credit rating was insufficient to qualify on their own, and the co-signer stepped in to assist the primary borrower to obtain financing without considering the long-term ramifications of that decision.
If the primary borrower defaults (or files bankruptcy), the co-signer will be required to pay the loan back. Additionally, unless the co-signer is also a “co-purchaser”, the co-signer is burdened only with the responsibility of repaying the debt and receives none of the benefit of the loan.
Consider the following example: Adam wants to buy a car, but can only qualify for a loan with a co-signer. Betsy agrees to co-sign, but her name is not listed on the title as an owner of the vehicle. Adam files for bankruptcy, and surrenders (gives back the car to the lender) and obtains a discharge of the car loan. Betsy is still legally obligated to repay the unpaid balance of the loan, but does not get title to the car when she finally finishes paying off the car – which now belongs to the bank.
Being a co-signer can be extremely risky, and if the primary borrower files for bankruptcy, your credit can be affected. However, you can manage the credit damage by doing the following:
1. Determine whether the primary borrower intends to reaffirm the debt in bankruptcy court, (i.e., keep the car and continue paying the loan), or will surrender it back to the lender.
2. If the primary borrower is going to reaffirm the vehicle, ensure that they keep the payments current through bankruptcy, and sign the reaffirmation agreement.
3. If the primary borrower is not intending to reaffirm, or has already lost the vehicle due to repossession, the only way to protect your credit is to repay the loan pursuant to the terms of the agreement
4. Be aware that many loans include an acceleration clause, meaning that if one of the borrowers files bankruptcy, the entire balance of the loan is due. If the lender exercises their right to accelerate the loan, the co-signer may not be able to make regular monthly payments.
Remember, the decision to co-sign a loan is often made out of a desire to help a friend or family member, but it comes with significant legal consequences if they fail to repay. Consider any request to co-sign a loan carefully, and if the primary borrower files for bankruptcy , it may be worth your while to reach out to a bankruptcy attorney to better understand your options and obligations regarding the loan.
If the primary borrower defaults (or files bankruptcy), the co-signer will be required to pay the loan back. Additionally, unless the co-signer is also a “co-purchaser”, the co-signer is burdened only with the responsibility of repaying the debt and receives none of the benefit of the loan.
Consider the following example: Adam wants to buy a car, but can only qualify for a loan with a co-signer. Betsy agrees to co-sign, but her name is not listed on the title as an owner of the vehicle. Adam files for bankruptcy, and surrenders (gives back the car to the lender) and obtains a discharge of the car loan. Betsy is still legally obligated to repay the unpaid balance of the loan, but does not get title to the car when she finally finishes paying off the car – which now belongs to the bank.
Being a co-signer can be extremely risky, and if the primary borrower files for bankruptcy, your credit can be affected. However, you can manage the credit damage by doing the following:
1. Determine whether the primary borrower intends to reaffirm the debt in bankruptcy court, (i.e., keep the car and continue paying the loan), or will surrender it back to the lender.
2. If the primary borrower is going to reaffirm the vehicle, ensure that they keep the payments current through bankruptcy, and sign the reaffirmation agreement.
3. If the primary borrower is not intending to reaffirm, or has already lost the vehicle due to repossession, the only way to protect your credit is to repay the loan pursuant to the terms of the agreement
4. Be aware that many loans include an acceleration clause, meaning that if one of the borrowers files bankruptcy, the entire balance of the loan is due. If the lender exercises their right to accelerate the loan, the co-signer may not be able to make regular monthly payments.
Remember, the decision to co-sign a loan is often made out of a desire to help a friend or family member, but it comes with significant legal consequences if they fail to repay. Consider any request to co-sign a loan carefully, and if the primary borrower files for bankruptcy , it may be worth your while to reach out to a bankruptcy attorney to better understand your options and obligations regarding the loan.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
I’m suing someone and they filed for bankruptcy. What happens next?
As we have discussed in previous posts, immediately upon filing a voluntary Petition for Bankruptcy, the protections of the Automatic Stay go into effect to protect the debtor in an active bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C. §362(a) provides that the commencement or continuation of any acts or proceedings against the debtor in an effort to collect or recover any debt is automatically stayed, and any further efforts at collection are prohibited and punishable by law. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §362(k), an individual injured by any willful violation of a stay provided by this section shall recover actual damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees, and, in appropriate circumstances, may recover punitive damages.
Therefore, if you are the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit against a debtor in bankruptcy, it is imperative that you immediately cease collection efforts against the debtor, including ensuring the court takes no further action with respect to the case. Debtor’s counsel should file a “Suggestion of Bankruptcy” with the court, which is a notice to the Court that a party to the case is in bankruptcy, and the case may not proceed with respect to them or any claims against them. If the Debtor’s counsel does not file a suggestion of bankruptcy, in order to avoid the penalties of 11 U.S.C. §362(k), you or your attorney should ensure the court is aware that a party to the case has filed for bankruptcy. The Court Clerk or your civil attorney will advise you on the proper way to file such a notice.
Once the case has been stayed (i.e., paused), you must decide if you have grounds to pursue your claims in bankruptcy court, or have a reason why the particular debt is nondischargable by law in bankruptcy. For example, debts which were obtained by false pretenses, or false representations, or actual fraud are not dischargeable, nor are debts owed for fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity, or embezzlement or larceny, among other things. Each of these categories have particular legal requirements in order to prove nondischargability, and in order to prevent the discharge of that debt, you will need to prepare and file an Adversary Proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court.
Procedurally, an Adversary Proceeding is conducted much like a lawsuit in District Court or Superior Court, although the Bankruptcy Court maintains jurisdiction over the resolution of the claims. Removing a case to bankruptcy court can have far-reaching consequences on other aspects of the litigation, and we strongly recommend you consult with an attorney before doing so.
In some situations where your debt is secured or enjoys a legal priority over other debts, and there are assets available in the bankruptcy to pay creditors, it may not be necessary to file an adversarial proceeding, but rather a Proof of Claim. A Proof of Claim is your notice to the court establishing the existence of a debt and the nature of the debt, and will be reviewed by the Trustee and the debtor’s counsel. If funds are available to satisfy your class of debt, you may receive payment (partial or full, depending on the assets obtained from the debtor) from the bankruptcy trustee on behalf of the debtor’s bankruptcy estate.
Regardless, if you are involved in litigation and the opposing party files for bankruptcy, contact Attorney Matthew P. Trask to discuss how the bankruptcy will affect your case and claims moving forward. To fail to assert your rights in the bankruptcy case so could be an extremely costly mistake.
Therefore, if you are the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit against a debtor in bankruptcy, it is imperative that you immediately cease collection efforts against the debtor, including ensuring the court takes no further action with respect to the case. Debtor’s counsel should file a “Suggestion of Bankruptcy” with the court, which is a notice to the Court that a party to the case is in bankruptcy, and the case may not proceed with respect to them or any claims against them. If the Debtor’s counsel does not file a suggestion of bankruptcy, in order to avoid the penalties of 11 U.S.C. §362(k), you or your attorney should ensure the court is aware that a party to the case has filed for bankruptcy. The Court Clerk or your civil attorney will advise you on the proper way to file such a notice.
Once the case has been stayed (i.e., paused), you must decide if you have grounds to pursue your claims in bankruptcy court, or have a reason why the particular debt is nondischargable by law in bankruptcy. For example, debts which were obtained by false pretenses, or false representations, or actual fraud are not dischargeable, nor are debts owed for fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity, or embezzlement or larceny, among other things. Each of these categories have particular legal requirements in order to prove nondischargability, and in order to prevent the discharge of that debt, you will need to prepare and file an Adversary Proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court.
Procedurally, an Adversary Proceeding is conducted much like a lawsuit in District Court or Superior Court, although the Bankruptcy Court maintains jurisdiction over the resolution of the claims. Removing a case to bankruptcy court can have far-reaching consequences on other aspects of the litigation, and we strongly recommend you consult with an attorney before doing so.
In some situations where your debt is secured or enjoys a legal priority over other debts, and there are assets available in the bankruptcy to pay creditors, it may not be necessary to file an adversarial proceeding, but rather a Proof of Claim. A Proof of Claim is your notice to the court establishing the existence of a debt and the nature of the debt, and will be reviewed by the Trustee and the debtor’s counsel. If funds are available to satisfy your class of debt, you may receive payment (partial or full, depending on the assets obtained from the debtor) from the bankruptcy trustee on behalf of the debtor’s bankruptcy estate.
Regardless, if you are involved in litigation and the opposing party files for bankruptcy, contact Attorney Matthew P. Trask to discuss how the bankruptcy will affect your case and claims moving forward. To fail to assert your rights in the bankruptcy case so could be an extremely costly mistake.
Monday, April 9, 2012
I’m being sued. Can a bankruptcy help?
If you are being sued on a debt collection matter, or other civil matter for which a money judgment can be imposed, filing bankruptcy may give you relief from your creditors. The Automatic Stay halts all existing court proceedings that the debtor is involved in, as well as any collection efforts for the individual's debts, until the bankruptcy proceedings are resolved.
In certain situations, the Automatic Stay might not prevent other court proceedings from continuing, at least in part. For example, in any family law case involving child support and custody, issues involving visitation or current child support are not subject to the Automatic Stay, but issues involving past due child support will be continued until the Automatic Stay is lifted at the end of bankruptcy proceedings.
The Automatic Stay is designed to provide some breathing room for the debtor in bankruptcy and provide the time and logistical ability to reorganize debts (as in a Chapter 11 or Chapter 13), or obtain a discharge (as in a Chapter 7 case). While the long-term resolution of a lawsuit will depend on the type of case, the Automatic Stay will provide some immediate protection for the debtor.
Ultimately, the debtor’s primary concern will be whether the debt or obligation on which the lawsuit is based will be discharged in bankruptcy. Absent fraud or certain other factors, most lawsuits arising out of consumer debts (e.g., lawsuits on unpaid credit cards or mortgage deficiencies following a foreclosure) are dischargeable under Chapter 7, and can be discharged following the successful completion of a Chapter 13 plan. However, the following debts arising under some suits cannot be discharged:
It is important to understand that the filing of a case will temporarily stop the lawsuit for many of the above claims, even though the actual debt is nondischargable. However, once the protections of the Automatic Stay expire, or the opposing party obtains permission from the Bankruptcy Court to move ahead, the case may proceed, and you may be required to pay any debt arising out of the above types of lawsuits, even after bankruptcy.
In certain situations, the Automatic Stay might not prevent other court proceedings from continuing, at least in part. For example, in any family law case involving child support and custody, issues involving visitation or current child support are not subject to the Automatic Stay, but issues involving past due child support will be continued until the Automatic Stay is lifted at the end of bankruptcy proceedings.
The Automatic Stay is designed to provide some breathing room for the debtor in bankruptcy and provide the time and logistical ability to reorganize debts (as in a Chapter 11 or Chapter 13), or obtain a discharge (as in a Chapter 7 case). While the long-term resolution of a lawsuit will depend on the type of case, the Automatic Stay will provide some immediate protection for the debtor.
Ultimately, the debtor’s primary concern will be whether the debt or obligation on which the lawsuit is based will be discharged in bankruptcy. Absent fraud or certain other factors, most lawsuits arising out of consumer debts (e.g., lawsuits on unpaid credit cards or mortgage deficiencies following a foreclosure) are dischargeable under Chapter 7, and can be discharged following the successful completion of a Chapter 13 plan. However, the following debts arising under some suits cannot be discharged:
- Lawsuits for unpaid taxes, custom duties, or debts to pay taxes or custom duties.
- Lawsuits collecting student loan debt.
- Lawsuits to collect unpaid spousal or child support.
- Lawsuits filed by a spouse, former spouse, or child to enforce a Court Order obtained in a domestic relations proceeding.
- Lawsuits where the debt was included in a previous bankruptcy wherein discharge of that particular debt was waived, such as reaffirmed debts.
- Lawsuits for debts owed for money, property, services, or refinancing of credit, if obtained by false pretenses, or false representations, or actual fraud.
- Lawsuits involving consumer debts for luxury goods obtained within ninety (90) days of the date of filing of the bankruptcy petition.
- Lawsuits involving cash advances obtained within seventy (70) days of the date of the filing of the bankruptcy petition.
- Lawsuits involving debts owed for fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity, or embezzlement or larceny.
- Debts owed for fines, penalties, or forfeitures payable to and for the benefit of governmental entity.
- Lawsuits and debts owed for death or personal injury arising from the operation of a motor vehicle, boat, or aircraft while intoxicated by drugs or alcohol.
It is important to understand that the filing of a case will temporarily stop the lawsuit for many of the above claims, even though the actual debt is nondischargable. However, once the protections of the Automatic Stay expire, or the opposing party obtains permission from the Bankruptcy Court to move ahead, the case may proceed, and you may be required to pay any debt arising out of the above types of lawsuits, even after bankruptcy.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
What does it mean if someone listed me in their bankruptcy as a Co-Debtor?
When a joint obligor on a promissory note or other debt files for bankruptcy, the bankruptcy code requires that notice of the bankruptcy case is provided to the creditor and all co-debtors who are also obligated to pay the debt. If you receive notice that a co-borrower or co-debtor on a particular debt has filed for bankruptcy, it means that the debtor is complying with this particular requirement of the statute. In order for any actual or contingent obligation to be dischargable in bankruptcy, the creditor (the individual or business which is owed money by the debtor) must receive notice of the bankruptcy case, and have the right to object to the discharge of the debt, if appropriate legal grounds exist to object.
The reason that the code requires that all co-borrowers receive notice is because whenever there is a joint debt, the individual co-borrowers have “contingent, unliquidated claims” against all the other borrowers. Put another way, if Danny and Alice borrow $5,000.00 jointly, and Danny doesn’t pay , the lender can sue Alice and force her to repay all of the $5,000.00. Alice can then sue Danny and force him to contribute to the payment of the judgment obtained against Alice. However, in the event Danny files for bankruptcy, neither the original lender, nor Alice can sue Danny in an attempt to collect the balance even if the lender seeks to collect against Alice.
In this case, Alice would be best served to speak to a bankruptcy attorney, because she has a very limited time to do what she can to protect her claim, if anything. Alice’s right to collect any money from Danny is very fact specific, and the whole story will determine whether Danny’s “contingent” debt to Alice can similarly be discharged. If you find yourself owing a joint debt with someone who has recently filed for bankruptcy , contact Attorney Matthew P. Trask to discuss your rights and obligations.
To read more about co-debtors and bankruptcy, see our post What happens to my Cosigner if I file for Bankruptcy.
The reason that the code requires that all co-borrowers receive notice is because whenever there is a joint debt, the individual co-borrowers have “contingent, unliquidated claims” against all the other borrowers. Put another way, if Danny and Alice borrow $5,000.00 jointly, and Danny doesn’t pay , the lender can sue Alice and force her to repay all of the $5,000.00. Alice can then sue Danny and force him to contribute to the payment of the judgment obtained against Alice. However, in the event Danny files for bankruptcy, neither the original lender, nor Alice can sue Danny in an attempt to collect the balance even if the lender seeks to collect against Alice.
In this case, Alice would be best served to speak to a bankruptcy attorney, because she has a very limited time to do what she can to protect her claim, if anything. Alice’s right to collect any money from Danny is very fact specific, and the whole story will determine whether Danny’s “contingent” debt to Alice can similarly be discharged. If you find yourself owing a joint debt with someone who has recently filed for bankruptcy , contact Attorney Matthew P. Trask to discuss your rights and obligations.
To read more about co-debtors and bankruptcy, see our post What happens to my Cosigner if I file for Bankruptcy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





